6. The New Covenant

When He said, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete.

This chapter will give a sweeping overview of the new covenant, determine how the New Testament defines the old covenant, and seek to find the proper relationship that exists between these two covenants. Several chapters later we will come back to this topic for further development.

The three main aspects of the old covenant were (1) the redemptive deliverance of Israel from Egypt, (2) the giving of the covenant at Sinai, and (3) the settlement of Israel in the land of Canaan.

When we come to the New Testament the dominant feature is the life, death and resurrection of Christ. Here we have a new saving activity and a new redemption that is greater than that experienced by Israel in the exodus. As the saving activity of the exodus served as the foundation for Israel’s law, service and worship, so for God’s new covenant people the saving activity of Christ serves as the foundation for their law, the motivation for their service and the theme of their worship. To the degree that the new saving activity is better than the old, to that same degree the new law is better than the old, the new motivation for service is better than the old motivation, and the new theme of worship is better than the old.

Christ, the basis of New Testament law

The redemption of Christ serves as the moral basis for New Testament law. While morality is clearly taught in the Old Testament, the New Testament writers seldom refer to Old Testament law as the reason for moral living, and when the law of the old covenant is mentioned in the epistles it is usually by way of illustration, rather than by way of command. In old covenant life, morality was seen as an obligation to numerous specific laws. In the new covenant, morality springs from a response to the living Christ. In 1 Corinthians 6 Paul admonishes Christians to stay away from prostitution and immorality. His reason for pure living is not based upon the laws of Sinai but upon the believer’s relationship with Christ.

Paul could have referred to the old covenant laws that prohibited impure living, such as “You shall not commit adultery,” and to portions of the Sinaitic Covenant which interpreted this law to apply to situations similar to the problems Paul was dealing with in Corinth. There was plenty of material in the old covenant he could have used but he chose rather to use a better moral foundation: union with Christ.

In Philippians 2:1−4, Paul is seeking to guide the Christian believers to care for each other, to do nothing from selfishness or conceit. In the old covenant we find the reason to treat one another with loving care to be something like this:

In the new covenant the focus of morality is no longer Sinai or the exodus from Egypt. The new covenant has a better focus.

We will come back to the topic of new covenant law for further development in Chapters 16 and 17; nevertheless in this introductory chapter it is important to understand that new covenant law has its moral foundation in the spotless righteousness of Christ.

Christ, the motivation for holy living

Under the new covenant the motivation for Christian living is centered in our love for Christ.

In his great masterpiece on salvation, the book of Romans, Paul first builds a solid foundation for man’s acceptance by God based upon faith in the perfect, finished work of Christ. Then, and only then, does he admonish in holy living. His motivation for Christian living is based upon the work of Christ, not the laws of Sinai.

Justification by faith in Christ is a better motivation than deliverance from Egypt.

Overthrowing the strongholds of Satan

As Old Testament history records the covenant people overthrowing the Canaanites and settling themselves in the land of Canaan, so New Testament history records the acts of the apostles and the early Christians taking the “land” of the Gentile nations. In the old covenant God manifested His mighty works in overthrowing the walls of Jericho and driving out the inhabitants of the land of Canaan. In the new covenant we see Christians filled with the power of the Holy Spirit overthrowing the strongholds of Satan, casting out demons, healing the sick, raising the dead and setting the captives free.

Christ, the theme of new covenant worship

When we come to understand that the One who died on the cross for our sins is KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS (Rev. 19:16), then we will join the millions who with a loud voice proclaim,

When we understand and experience the new covenant gospel, when we realize that we who are sinners can stand without fault before the throne of God; when we experience the indwelling Christ, then we, too, will fall down and worship.

Christ, a better revelation

Just as the old, slow, cumbersome, hand-operated calculator has been antiquated by the new, fast, compact, electronic computer, so the old covenant has been antiquated by the new. It was the best for its time, but now, new, better things have come.

The flickering candle of truth which lighted the shadowy pathways of Old Testament history must give way to the unveiled glory of the Risen Son!

New Testament definitions of old covenant

Before we seek to discover what the New Testament teaches regarding the relationship that should exist between the old and new covenants, we must first determine what the New Testament defines as the old covenant. It is clear and definitive.

In our study of the old covenant we found that the Ten Commandments were the covenant. They were called the “tablets of the testimony” (Ex. 31:18), the “words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments” (Ex. 34:28), “the testimony” (Ex. 40:20), “the covenant of the Lord” (1 Ki. 8:8,9,21).

We also found that the other laws in the books of Exodus through Deuteronomy were called the “book of the covenant” (Ex. 24:7) or “the book of the law” (Deut. 31:26). We saw that these laws served as an interpretation or expansion of the Ten Commandments. Does the New Testament agree with our findings?

The writer of Hebrews defines the “first covenant” as the Sinaitic Covenant and specifically mentions “the tables of the covenant” (the Ten Commandments).

In the following reference both aspects of the old covenant are mentioned.

In these verses Paul is contrasting the new covenant with the old and in so doing defines the old covenant exactly as we found in our study of the Old Testament. The old covenant was not only on “tablets of stone” but “written with ink”—a reference to the “book of the covenant.” Both are included in Paul’s definition of old covenant.

In the book of Galatians Paul specifically mentions that the old covenant comes from Mt. Sinai.

This contains an allegory; for these women are two covenants, one proceeding from Mount Sinai bearing children who are to be slaves (Gal. 4:24).

We see, then, that the New Testament confirms our conclusions regarding old covenant documents. The Sinaitic Covenant is called the “old” or the “first” covenant in the New Testament. The New Testament speaks of the “old” or “first” covenant as being “engraved on stone,” and calls it the “tablets of the covenant”; both are clear references to the Ten Commandments. The New Testament also includes “the book of the covenant” which was “written with ink,” in its definition of the old, or first, covenant.

Old and new covenant relationships

Now that we have confirmed what the New Testament means when it refers to the old, or first, covenant, we must next address the proper relationship that should exist between these two covenants. Their relationship is very important and often highly controversial. From New Testament times to the present day this subject has been vigorously debated. There were Judaizing Christians whom Paul confronted who said that unless a person kept all the laws of the old covenant, one could not be saved. Then, on the other extreme, there have been those like Marcion, a second-century Christian philosopher in Asia Minor, who felt the Christian church should not even include the Old Testament in its accepted canon of Scripture.

Some take a simplistic approach to the relationship that should exist between the new and old covenants: “I believe in the whole Bible. It doesn’t really matter whether God says it in the New Testament or in the Old Testament; if He says it, it’s good enough for me.” In practice, however, even those who feel this way must pick and choose among the old covenant laws. What Christian today is willing to stone a person to death for a violation of Sabbath law? What married Christian man is willing to take his brother’s wife and raise up children for a deceased brother while still married to his wife? Who is going to insist that Christians wear tassels on the four corners of their garments?1 Yet all of these are old covenant laws (Ex. 31:14; Deut. 25:5−10; 22:12).

In practical Christian experience, we usually try to find a church where we feel “comfortable.” We like the way the pastor “explains the Bible,” or “teaches truth.” When this takes place, consciously or unconsciously, we are often led to accept the “system of truth” that is taught. The church will, by applying its theological framework, choose to accept, and perhaps even enforce, certain of the Old Testament laws, while choosing to ignore certain others. Thus the church system, whatever that system is, becomes the grid by which to filter out the Old Testament laws which “still apply,” while letting others fall into the hopper labeled, “not for today.” The problem here is that the “system of truth” is often taken for granted. The point I am making is that we, ourselves, ought to be conscious of what we are doing and seriously evaluate whether certain old covenant laws should be enforced and others discarded. We need to have clear, scriptural principles to guide us in our application of old covenant laws. Too often those who enforce old covenant laws do so on the basis of the old covenant statements themselves without letting the new covenant interpret, modify, or transform these laws with reference to Jesus Christ, the new covenant center.

Let us now carefully examine the New Testament evidence which compares and contrasts the old covenant with the new. In doing so our purpose is to discover principles of interpretation which will help us correctly understand which covenant is to have precedence and why.

The Old CovenantThe New Covenant
God spokeGod has spoken with finality
to the fathersto us
long agoin these last days
in the prophetsin His Son
in many portions,Who is the radiance of His glory
and in many waysthe exact representation of his nature

In the old covenant God did speak. He spoke to the fathers: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and others. His revelation to them was fragmentary: a few direct statements and a few other revelations in summary and shadowy form. For example, the statement, “In you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Gen. 12:3), was not fully understood by the fathers. It would take hundreds, yes, thousands of years before the meaning of that succinct statement would be fully understood.

The prophets often were at a loss to know the full intent of their own visions. For example, in the following quotation we see the prophet Daniel wondering what his vision meant.

The high point of God’s revelation in the Old Testament was the predictive event of Abraham offering the ram in the place of his beloved son, Isaac who carried the wood for the offering up Mt. Mariah in perfect obedience to his father. The giving of the Ten Commandments on Mt. Sinai is a close second. Yet even these two revelations of God fade into nothingness when compared with the revelation of the life of Jesus, who could say, “He who has seen Me has seen the Father” (Jn. 14:9).

The old covenant was given “to the fathers” “long ago,” for the time then present. The new is given “to us” “in these last days.” The old revelation of truth was incomplete, fragmentary: “God spoke.” In the new revelation God speaks with finality: “God has spoken.” Jesus is God’s final word. Why? Because “He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His [God’s] nature.”

Jesus: The better new covenant

When we studied the old covenant, we found that there were sacrifices only for unintentional sins. However, when we come to the new covenant we find better things.

The above teaching gives insight into Jesus’ treatment of the woman caught in adultery and his words to the dying thief. Now the door of grace and mercy is wide!

The Jewish Christians, to whom the book of Hebrews was written, had been driven from their synagogues and the pageantry of the temple service. They were being persecuted; some had given up their lands and houses. Living the humble Christian life, meeting in homes for Christian services did not compare outwardly to the safe, comfortable “good old days” when they were still practicing Judaism. Some were tempted to go back to the easy life of Judaism. So the writer shows these suffering Christians that the reality of their new life in Christ far supersedes that possible within the framework of the old covenant. The book of Hebrews was written to help Jewish Christians move away from the old covenant as a source of truth and as a guideline for worship. It does this by showing how much better the new covenant is over the old. A quick survey of this book shows the relationship between these two covenants.

  • Is a better revelation of truth (Heb. 1:1−3).
  • Is better than the angels (Heb. 1:3−14).
  • Is worthy of more glory than Moses (Heb. 3:13).
  • Gives a better hope (Heb. 6:9−11).
  • Has a better guarantee in Christ (Heb. 7:22).
  • Has a more excellent ministry (Heb. 8:6).
  • Has a better mediator in Christ (Heb. 8:6).
  • Is enacted on better promises (Heb. 8:6).
  • Cleansed with better sacrifices (Heb. 9:23).
  • Promises a better country (Heb. 11:16).
  • Promises a better resurrection (Heb. 11:35).
  • Gives us something better (Heb. 11:40).
  • Has a better mediator (Heb. 8:6; 12:24).
  • Speaks with better blood (Heb. 12:24).

We must remember that the writer of Hebrews was writing to a people who loved the old covenant services. While his writing is to the point and at times very strong, he nevertheless couched his words so he would not offend his intended readers. Therefore, he chooses to use the often-repeated word “better” to describe the difference between the two covenants. However, when we turn to comparisons of the two covenants in documents which were written to Gentile audiences we find stronger language used.

2 Corinthians 3:3−18

Old CovenantNew Covenant
written with inkwritten with the Spirit
on tables of stoneon tablets of human hearts
inadequate (implied)adequate servants
of the letterof the Spirit
letter killsSpirit gives life
ministry of deathministry of the Spirit
came with gloryabounds in glory
ministry of condemnationministry of righteousness
glory fadesglory surpasses it
now has no gloryremains in glory
veil remains unliftedveil removed in Christ
veil lies over their heartveil taken away
bondage (implied)liberty
unable to change heart (implied)being transformed

In the next few verses, Paul comes to more practical matters. What about reading the old covenant?

What is Paul saying here? First, the people with the veil over their faces (in his case the Jews, or Judaizers) are those who accept the old covenant as it reads or read it through old covenant eyes. Paul is saying that to understand the old covenant correctly we must see it from the new covenant perspective. This is a very important principle of interpretation. The new covenant, which is a better and more nearly complete revelation of truth, must be allowed to interpret, modify or transform all old covenant statements in a Christ-centered way.

Second, if we continue to read the old covenant from any other perspective it will be as though we are looking through a veil and we could come to the wrong conclusions. This means that we should not accept any old covenant laws or practices on the basis of the old covenant statements themselves. Rather, we must ex- amine every old covenant law and statement from the new covenant perspective: Jesus Christ.

Applying this principle to the topic of the Sabbath means that as Christians we are not to go directly to old covenant laws and statements regarding Sabbath rest. Rather, we are to discover what the new covenant teaches about God’s rest and allow it to modify or transform all old covenant Sabbath law from a Christ-centered perspective.

Before we leave the discussion of Paul’s comparison of the two covenants, I would like to point out his frequent mention of the Holy Spirit in connection with the new covenant. We will deal more fully with this concept a few chapters later, but for now keep your eyes and hearts open for insights regarding the work of the Holy Spirit in the new covenant. The Holy Spirit is vitally important to a correct understanding and application of new covenant law!

We will next examine the way Jesus related to the ritual and moral laws of the old covenant to find a pattern which will help us better understand the Sabbath encounters of Jesus recorded in the Gospels.

Chapter Summary

  1. The new covenant centers upon the life, death and resurrection of Christ.
  2. The redemption from sin brought by the life, death and resurrection of Jesus serves as the moral foundation for new covenant law, the motivation for Christian living and the theme of Christian worship.
  3. The new covenant calls the Sinaitic Covenant the “old covenant” or the “first covenant.”
  4. The new covenant defines the old covenant as both the Ten Commandments and the other laws which made up the old covenant.
  5. The new covenant is much better than the old in every way.
  6. The new covenant has greater authority than the old covenant.
  7. Unless the old covenant is interpreted by the new and read in a Christ-centered way, the reader will not understand it correctly.

Endnotes

  1. Certain “Christian” groups are now insisting that this should be done!

 

Dale Ratzlaff
Latest posts by Dale Ratzlaff (see all)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.